Determine Criteria of Assessment to Prioritize Problems of Urban Freight Transport Using a Decision-making and Average Weighted Method (Case Study: Tehran City)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 MSc. Graduated, Faculty of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

2 Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Art, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The problems of urban freight transport have become an important issue in urban management in recent years. Surveys of different groups involved in urban freight transportation, in addition to receiving various opinions and understanding their problems and concerns, will find appropriate implementation methods for management. This paper aims to analyze urban freight problems from the perspective of different groups. For this purpose, 478 questionnaires were collected in the form of face-to-face and online interviews from different groups in Tehran. More than 90% of citizens consider air pollution and accidents as the most important problems of urban freight transport, while more than 40% of freight operators considered low fare and improper handling of goods as the most important. The main problems for drivers were the high maintenance costs and the lack of a union to defend their rights. Two statistical methods of weighted average responses and concordance analysis were used to prioritize the problem from the point of view of managers, experts and citizens. Results of both methods similarly showed that environmental protection, increasing safety and providing municipal revenue from sustainable sources are the most important priorities of managers and experts. From the citizens' point of view, maintaining the quality of cargo has replaced the provision of municipal revenue from sustainable sources. Results show differences in the main concerns of different groups. For instance, the goal of providing municipal revenue from sustainable sources is the least important from the citizens' point of view, while the lack of stable revenue has caused Tehran Municipality to receive tolls to cover the current expenses of the city with the uneven sprawl of the city. This issue is considered very important by experts because of the awareness of the consequences of unsustainable urban development compared to citizens.

Keywords


-­Aultman-Hall, L., Hill, M., & Agent, K. (1999), “Methodology for evaluating large truck access to intermodal and other facilities”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1653), pp.61-68.
 
-­Casavant, K., (2001), “Strategic Freight Transportation Analysis (SFTA) (No. WA-RD 497.1,)”, Washington State Department of Transportation.
 
- Collings, S., (2003), “A guide on how to set up and run freight quality partnerships”. GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE 335.
 
-­Eimen Paya Consulting Engineers, (2003), Heavy Vehicles Traffic Studies in Tehran, Tehran Transportation and Traffic Organization, (In Persian).
 
-­Federal Highway Administration Office of Transportation Policy Studies, (2005), “An Initial Assessment of Freight Bottlenecks on Highways”.
 
-­Hensher, D. A., & Golob, T. F., (1999), “Searching for policy priorities in the formulation of a freight transport strategy: a canonical correlation analysis of freight industry attitudes”, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 35(4), pp.241-267.
 
-­Iran Comprehensive Transportation Studies. (2005), “Ministry of Roads andUrban Development”, (In Persian).
 
- J. Schoemaker et al., (2006), Best Urban freight solutions, quantification of Urban freight transport.
 
-­Jamour, Davood, Mehdi Hassanzadeh, Mehdi Emami Meybodi and Meysam Ziaee, (2017), “Analysis of The Freight Transport Situation in The Mashhad and Identify Strategies for Organizing Freight Transport, Sixteenth International Conference of Transportation and Traffic Engineering”, Tehran, Iran (In Persian).
 
-­­Kalpage, N. P., (2000), Cost benefit analysis regarding the clearing and forwarding business in Ceylon Shipping Corporation Ltd.
 
- Ma, J., Zhang, Q., Zhou, D., & Fan, Z. P., (2011), “A multiple person multiple attribute decision making method based on preference information and decision matrix”, Department of Information Systems, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong, China Malcolm.
 
-­Mashad Goods Transportation Master Plan in Cooperation with Science and Technology Research Institute, (2011), “Mashad Traffic and Transportation Organization”, (In Persian).
 
-­Metropolis, C., (2004), “The Metropolis Freight Plan: Delivering the Goods”, Chicago Metropolis 2020.
 
Monfared J. Haghighat and M. Kiani. (2011), "Factors Affecting the Productivity of Domestic Freight Companies in the Tehran Province", Journal of Future Management Studies, Vol. 22, No. 88, pp. 121-136 (In Persian).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- Morris, A., Kornhauser, A., & Kay, M. (1998), “Urban freight mobility: collection of data on time, costs, and barriers related to moving product into the central business district. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1613), pp.27-32.
 
-­Portland Office of Transportation, (2006), Portland Freight master plan.
 
-­RahpooyanConsulting Engineers, (2011), “Studies of Transportation and Traffic Management of Qom City, Transportation and Traffic Department of Qom Municipality” (In Persian).
 
- Regan, A. C., & Golob, T. F., (1999), “Freight operators' perceptions of congestion problems and the application of advanced technologies: Results from a 1998 survey of 1200 companies operating in California. Transportation Journal, 38(3), pp.57-67.
 
- Tehran Comprehensive Transportation and Traffic Project, (2009), “Transportation of Inland cargo and goods, Transportation and Traffic Department of Tehran Municipality”, (In Persian).
 
- Taniguchi, E., & Tamagawa, D., (2005), “Evaluating city logistics measures considering the behavior of several stakeholders”, Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, pp.3062-3076.