Long-Term Lateral Cyclic Response of Suction Caisson Foundations

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Geotechnical Engineering Department, Faculty of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University (SBU), Tehran, Iran.

2 Instructor, Housing & Urban Development Research Center, Tehran, Iran.

10.22034/road.2021.124806

Abstract

Suction caissons have been used increasingly by the offshore industry throughout the world to anchor floating production systems, offshore wind turbines, oil and gas industry and anchorage elements. Suction caissons as the foundation of marine structures are usually exposed to the lateral cyclic forces of wind, waves and the impact of ships. Recent studies have considered the response of suction caissons to such loading in single-layer soil, but have generally been limited to a few thousand cycles, whereas offshore structures will generally experience millions of loading cycles over their service life. seabed soils can also contain different layers. In this article, after reviewing the results of research on lateral loading of suction caissons with a limited number of cycles, the results of recent studies with a very large number of loading cycles and about 1 million cycles are presented. Also, the long-term behavior of suction caissons to lateral cyclic loading in single-layer and layered seabed are reviewed. based on the summary of the results of existing studies, it seems that lateral cyclic loading can even in some cases increase the caisson capacity by up to 30% and stiffness by up to 50%. This change in stiffness must be taken into account in changing the natural frequency of the system or investigating the possible occurrence of the resonance phenomenon.

Keywords


-Abadie, C. N., Byrne, B. W. & Levy-Paing, S. (2015), “Model pile response to multi-amplitude cyclic lateral loading in cohesionless soils”, In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics (ISFOG) (Meyer, V. (ed)). Leiden, the Netherlands: CRC Press/Balkema (Taylor & Francis Group),
pp. 681-686.
-Bhattacharya, S., (2014), “Challenges in design of foundations for offshore wind turbines”, Engineering & Technology Reference. Stevenage, UK: Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET).
-Bhattacharya, S., Nikitas, N., Garnsey, J., Alexander, N. A., Cox, J., Lombardi, D., Wood, D. M. & Nash, D. F. T., (2013), “Observed dynamic soil–structure interaction in scale testing of offshore wind turbine foundations.”, Soil Dynamics Earthquake Engng 54, pp.47–60.  
-Bienen, B., O’Loughlin, C. D & Zhu, F. Y. (2017), “Physical modelling of suction bucket installation and response under long-term cyclic loading”, Proceedings of 8th Offshore Site Investigation & Geotechnics International Conference (OSIG 2017), Kensington, London, pp. 524-531.
Byrne, B. W., (2014), “Laboratory scale modelling for offshore geotechnical problems”, In Proceeding of the 8th international conference on physical modelling in geotechnics (ICPMG) (eds C.GaudinandD.J.White), pp.61-75.
-Leiden,theNetherlands: CRC Press/Balkema (Taylor & Francis Group).
-Byrne,B.W.&Houlsby,G.T.(2004),“Experimental investigations of the response of suction caissons to transient combined loading”, J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Engng 130, No. 3, pp.240–253.
-Cox, J. A. , O’Loughlin, C. D., Cassidy, M., Bhattacharya, S., Gaudin, C. & Bienen, B., (2014), “Centrifuge study on the cyclic performance of caissons in sand”, International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 14(4), pp.99-115.
-Chow, S. H., O’Loughlin, C. D., Corti, R., Gaudin, C. & Diambra, A., (2015), “Drained cyclic capacity of plate anchors in dense sand: experimental and theoretical observations”, Géotechnique Letters 5(2), pp.80-85.
-De Ruiter, J. & Fox, D. A. (1975) Site investigations for North Sea forties field. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Offshore Technology Conference (OTC). Houston, Texas, OCT 2246, pp. 25-30.
-DNV, (2016), “Support structurs for wind turbines”, Offshore standard (DNVGL-ST-0126). Oslo, Norway: DNV.
-DNV (Det Norske Veritas) (2013), “DNV-OS-J101: Design of offshore wind turbine structures”, Offshore standard. Oslo, Norway: DNV.
-Foglia, A., Ibsen, L. B., Nicolai, G. & Andersen, L. V., (2014), “Observations on bucket foundations under cyclic loading in dense saturated sand In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics(ICPMG) (Gaudin, C. & White, D. J. (eds))”, Leiden, the Netherlands: CRC Press/Balkema (Taylor & Francis Group),
pp. 667-673.
-Foglia, A. & Ibsen, L. B., (2016), “Monopod bucket foundations under cyclic lateral loading”, Int. J. Offshore Polar Engng 26, No. 2,
pp.109–115.
-Forewind (2011), “Dogger Bank zonal characterization” Reading,UK: Forewind. See  http://www.forewind.co.uk/uploads/files/Zonal%.20characterisation%20document%20(second%20version).pdf (accessed 08/11/2017).
-Forewind (2013), “Environmental statement chapter 12 appendix A – GEMS geophysical survey report”, Reading, UK: Forewind. See http://www.forewind.co.uk/uploads/files/Creyke_Beck/Phase_2_ Consultation/Chapter_12_ Appendix_A__-_GEMS_Survey_ Report.pdf (accessed 08/11/2017).
-Fu, D., Gaudin, C., Tian, C., Bienen, B. & Cassidy, M. J., (2015), “Effects of preloading with consolidation on undrained bearing capacity of skirted circular footings. Géotechnique 65, No. 3, pp.231–246.
https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.14.P.2120.
-Gourvenec, S. & Randolph, M. F., (2010), “Consolidation beneath circular skirted foundations”, Int. J. Geomech. 10, No. 1,
pp.22–29.
-Houlsby, G. T., Kelly, R. B., Huxtable, J. & Byrne, B. W., (2005), “Field trials of suction caissons in clay for offshore wind turbine foundations” Géotechnique 55, No. 4,
pp.287–296.
 https://doi. org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.4.287.
-Houlsby, G. T., Kelly, R. B., Huxtable, J. & Byrne, B. W., (2006), “Field trials of suction caissons in sand for offshore wind turbine foundations”, Géotechnique 56, No. 1, pp.3–10. https://doi.org/ 10.1680/geot.2006.56.1.3.
-Ibsen, L. B. & Brincker, R., (2004), “Design of a new foundation for offshore wind turbines”, Proceedings of the 22nd international modal analysis conference (IMAC), Detroit, MI, USA.
-Kelly, R. B., Houlsby, G. T. & Byrne, B. W., (2006),  “A comparison of field and laboratory tests of caisson foundations in sand and clay. Géotechnique 56, No. 9, pp.617–626.
https://doi.org/ 10.1680/geot.2006.56.9.617.
-LeBlanc, C., Houlsby, G. T. & Byrne, B. W. (2010), “Response of stiff piles in sand to longterm cyclic lateral loading. Géotechnique 60(2), pp.70-90.
-Richardson, M. D., O’Loughlin, C. D., Randolph, M. F. & Gaudin, C., (2009), “Setup following installation of dynamic anchors in normally consolidated clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 135(4), pp.487-496.
-Schroeder, E. C., Merritt, A. S., Sørensen, K. W., Muir Wood, A., Thilsted, C. L. & Potts, D. M. (2015). Predicting monopile behaviour for the Gode Wind offshore wind farm. In Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on frontiers in offshore geotechnics (ISFOG) (ed. V. Meyer),
pp. 735–740.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-Watson, P. G. & Randolph, M. F. (2006), “A centrifuge study into cyclic loading of caisson foundations. Proceedings of the international conference physical modelling in geotechnics, Hong Kong, PR China, pp. 4–6.
-Zhu, B., Byrne, B. W. & Houlsby, G. T., (2013), “Long-term lateral cyclic response of suction caisson foundations in sand”, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 139(1), pp.73-83.
-Zhu, F. Y., O’Loughlin, C., Bienen, B., Cassidy, M. J., & Morgan, N., (2018a), “The response of suction caissons to long-term lateral cyclic loading in single-layer and layered seabeds”, Geotechnique, 68 (8), pp.729-741.
-Zhu, F. Y., (2018), “Suction caisson foundations for offshore wind energy installations in layered soils”, PhD thesis, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth, Australia.
-Zhu, F. Y., Bienen, B., O’Loughlin, C., Cassidy, M. J., and Morgan, N., (2018b), “Suction caisson foundations for offshore wind energy: cyclic response in sand and sand over clay”, Accepted manuscript doi: 10.1680/jgeot.17.pp.273. Published online in ‘accepted manuscript.