Effects of MDOM Techniques Using Functional Values in Economical Evaluation (Case Study: Chamran-Jalal Al Ahmad Interchange Design)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abstract

Seeing that increase of population and transportation in metropolitans, urban needs have been growing dramatically. In general, due to statistical and variation essence of traffics, needs are also changed during the time. Therefore, to achieve long-term success in urban design it needs to strongly consider economical aspects besides compatibility and efficiency of designs. Because of such complexity, Multi-Objective Decision Making (MODM) methods implemented to assist decision makers in making deliberate choice. The main purpose of this paper is presenting the effects of MODM Techniques in economical evaluation of urban projects using functional values. Results show that, MODM methods look efficient in project’s economical evaluation perfectly. By using these methods in a case study, number of desired choices and its functional values content are increased significantly. It also creates practical possibility for decision makers to successfully combine and categorize alternatives for more preferred results.

References

 
-      AliasI, M. A., Mohd HashimI, (1987), S. Z., and Samsudin, S., Multi Criteria Decision Making and Its Applications: A Literature Review, Jurnal Teknologi Maklumat,
Vol. 20.
 
-      Ching-Lai Hwang, Abu Syed Md. Masud., (1979), Multiple Objective Decision Making Methods & Applications, A State Of The Art Survey, Lecture Notes In Economics & Mathematical Systems, Springer-Verlag,
New York.
 
-      Easton, A., (1973), Complex Managerial Decisions Involving Multiple Objectives, Wiley, New York.
 
-      Haimes, Y. Y., W. A. Hall and H. T. (1975), Freedman, Multi objective Optimization in Water Resources Systems, the Surrogate worth  Trade-off Method, Elsevier Scientific, New York.
 
-      Ignizio, J. P., (1976), Goal Programming and Extensions, Lexington Books, Massachusetts.
 
-      Ijiri, Y., (1965), “Management Goals and Accounting for Control, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
 
-      Johnsen, E., (1968),  Studies in Decision Models, Monograph No.1, Economic Research Center in Lund, Sweden
 
-      Keeney, R. L. and H. Raiffa, (1976), Decision with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Wiley, New York.
 
-      Kuhn, H. W., and A. W. Tucker,) 1951), "Nonlinear Programming", in J. Neyman (ed.), Proceedings Second Berkeley Symposium on Hathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 481-491.
 
-      Lee, S. M., (1972), Goal Programming for Decision Analysis, Auerbach Publishers, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
 
-      Wilhelm, J., (1976), Objectives and Multi-objective Decision Making Under Uncertainty, Springer-Verlag, New York.
 
-      Wallenius, J., (1975), Interactive Multiple Criteria Decision Methods: An Investigation and Approach, the Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki.
 
-      Zeleny, M., (1974), Linear Hulti objective Programming, Springer-Verlag, New York.
 
-      Zopunidis, C., (2000), Special Issueı on Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support with Multiple Criteria. Computers & Operations Research, vol. 27, pp. 597-599.
 
-      احمدپور، ط. امیری، ع.، "بکارگیری مهندسی ارزش در پروژه‌های مطالعاتی معاونت فنی و عمرانی شهرداری تهران"، کنفرانس بین المللی مهندسی ارزش و مدیریت هزینه، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران.
 
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics