Analyzing the Effects of Transportation Development on Macroeconomic Indicators in Iran: A Granger Causality Approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Hassan Khaksar 1
Alireza Kadkhodayi 2
Shahin Hassani 3
1 Professor, Civil Engineering, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 M.Sc., Grad., Civil Engineering, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Ph.D., Student, School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
10.22034/road.2026.584236.2496
Abstract
Development of transport and logistics infrastructure is one of the fundamental prerequisites for sustainable growth and the enhancement of national economic competitiveness, and it affects macroeconomic variables through channels such as reducing transaction costs, improving spatial accessibility, and increasing the efficiency of supply chains. Accordingly, analyzing the dynamic and endogenous relationship between transport development and key macroeconomic indicators is of particular importance for evidence‑based policymaking. Using time‑series data for Iran within a Vector Autoregression (VAR) framework, this study examines the interactions between transport development and gross domestic product, inflation, unemployment, stock market index, exchange rate, and liquidity. Preliminary diagnostic tests indicate that the statistical properties of the variables are suitable for estimating the VAR model, and the optimal lag length is determined as two periods based on standard information criteria. The estimated VAR model, with an adjusted coefficient of determination of approximately 0.98 for the transport development equation, reveals a very high explanatory power. Based on Granger causality tests, transport development is found to Granger‑cause GDP growth, stock market performance, and liquidity expansion in a statistically significant manner, while several macroeconomic variables also exert significant causal effects on transport. The results of forecast error variance decomposition indicate that, in the long run, the contribution of transport‑related shocks to the variance of GDP and liquidity fluctuations increases substantially, and the impulse response functions further confirm a positive and persistent impact of transport shocks on economic growth and stock market performance.
Keywords
Transport Development
Logistics Infrastructure
Macroeconomic Variables
Vector Autoregressive (VAR) Model
Granger Causality
- پهلوانی، مصیب؛ مهرابی‌بشرآبادی، حسین؛ و افشارپور، مهلا (۱۳۹۳). بررسی تأثیر توسعه زیرساخت‌های حمل‌ونقل بر رشد اقتصادی استان‌های ایران. تحقیقات مدل‌سازی اقتصادی، ۴(۱۶)، 99-127.
- خاکساری، علی (۱۳۹۵). تخمین مدل تأثیر توسعه حمل‌ونقل ریلی بر رشد اقتصادی کشور طی سال‌های ۱۳۵۰–۱۳۸۹. پژوهشنامه حمل‌ونقل، ۱۳(۲). 25-10.
- دائی‌کریم‌زاده، سعید؛ عمادزاده، مصطفی؛ و کامکار دلاکه، هادی (۱۳۸۸). اثر سرمایه‌گذاری دولت در بخش حمل‌ونقل بر رشد اقتصادی در ایران. مدل‌سازی اقتصادی، ۳(۴)، 82-63.
- دهقانی‌شبانی، زهرا؛ و عظیم، نازنین (۱۳۹۹). تأثیر قیمت حمل‌ونقل جاده‌ای بر شاخص قیمت بخش‌های مختلف اقتصادی در ایران. مطالعات مدیریت ترافیک، ۱۵(۲)، 164-131.
- رضایی‌ارجرودی، عبدالرضا؛ و تسبیحی، آمنه (۱۳۸۶). ارائه مدل ارتباطی توسعه حمل‌ونقل و رشد اقتصادی در ایران بر مبنای الگوی رگرسیون برداری. پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه پایدار، ۶(۲)، 125-138.
- ضرغامیان‌پور، فریبا؛ شریفی‌رنانی، حسین؛ و قبادی، سارا (۱۴۰۳). نقش سرمایه‌گذاری مستقیم خارجی در اثرگذاری عملکرد لجستیک و کیفیت نهادی بر رشد اقتصادی ایران. اقتصاد و تجارت نوین، ۱۹(۳)، 101-76.
-مرکز پژوهش‌های اتاق ایران (۱۳۹۶). اهمیت و تحولات بخش لجستیک در اقتصاد ایران طی دوره ۱۳۶۵–۱۳۹۵. اتاق بازرگانی، صنایع، معادن و کشاورزی ایران.
 
-Aschauer, D. A. (1989). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23(2), 177–200.
-Lakshmanan, T. R. (2011). The broader economic consequences of transport infrastructure investments. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(1), 1–12.
-Farhadi, M. (2015). Transport infrastructure and long-run economic growth in OECD countries. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74, 73–90.
-Barro, R. J. (1990). Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Pt. 2), S103–S125.
-Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499.
-Blanchard, O. J., & Galí, J. (2010). Labor markets and monetary policy: A New Keynesian model with unemployment. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(2), 1–30.
-Levine, R. (1997). Financial development and economic growth: Views and agenda. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(2), 688–726.
-Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.
-Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.
-Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.
-Banister, D., & Berechman, Y. (2001). Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth. Journal of Transport Geography, 9(3), 209–218.
-Saidi, S., Mani, V., Mefteh, H., Shahbaz, M., & Akhtar, P. (2020). Dynamic linkages between transport, logistics, foreign direct investment, and economic growth: Empirical evidence from developing countries. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 141, 277–293.
-Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The spatial economy: Cities, regions, and international trade. MIT Press.
-OECD. (2021). OECD transport outlook 2021. OECD Publishing.
-Ojala, L., Arvis, J.-F., Shepherd, B., Wiederer, C., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K., & Kiiski, T. (2018). Connecting to compete 2018: Trade logistics in the global economy. World Bank.
-Rietveld, P., & Vickerman, R. (2004). Transport in regional science: The “death of distance” is premature. Papers in Regional Science, 83(1), 229–248.
-Ojala, L., Arvis, J.-F., Shepherd, B., Wiederer, C., Raj, A., Dairabayeva, K., & Kiiski, T. (2018). Connecting to compete 2018: Trade logistics in the global economy. World Bank.
-Limão, N., & Venables, A. J. (2001). Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs, and trade. The World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 451–479.
-Canning, D., & Pedroni, P. (2008). Infrastructure, long-run economic growth and causality tests for cointegrated panels. The Manchester School, 76(5), 504–527.
-Melo, P. C., Graham, D. J., & Brage-Ardao, R. (2013). The productivity of transport infrastructure investment: A meta-analysis of empirical evidence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(5), 695–706.
 -Lean, H. H., Huang, W., & Hong, J. (2014). Logistics and economic development: Experience from China. Transport Policy, 32, 96–104.
-Donaldson, D. (2018). Railroads of the Raj: Estimating the impact of transportation infrastructure. American Economic Review, 108(4–5), 899–934.
-Tang, C. F., & Abosedra, S. (2019). Logistics performance, exports, and growth: Evidence from Asian economies. Research in Transportation Economics, 78, 100743.
-Wu, B., & Levinson, D. M. (2024). A multi-modal analysis of the effect of transport on population and productivity in China. Journal of Transport Geography, 116, 103856.