Assessing the Resilience of the Road and Road Transport Organization based on the Organizational Capacity Index in the Event of an Accident (Case Study: General Directorate of Road and Road Transport in the South of Kerman Province)

Document Type : Original Article

Author
M.Sc., Grad., Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Research has shown that the ability of a society's organizations to manage crises and challenges has a significant impact on its ability to deal with crises and the quality of recovery from challenges. Organizations with the essential services they provide in times of crisis play an important role in speeding up society's return to normal conditions. To assess organizational capacity a crisis futures study scenario for the main branches of the organization involved in the crisis, namely road management, logistics and fleet, and safety and privacy will be developed, and then we will analyze and structure the sustainable resilience of this organization against the crisis. The researcher's intention in this study is to use the study of organizational resilience in the studied sample to assess the level of resilience, vulnerability and the operation of the above device will be dealt with in the face of transportation related crises. Considering the newly-established case study compared to other similar samples of the country and the extent of the conservation area and diversity of disasters and accidents, extraction and classification of the obtained data can be a useful and new way to reduce damages and increase the response speed and prevention power of the General Directorate of Terminals and Road Transportation Southern Kerman province and on a larger scale, the Organization of Road Maintenance and Transportation of the country against natural and man-made crises and accidents.
Keywords

-مانی. مدیریت بهره‌وری، 12(44)، 35-65.
-ایزدی، حسین (1396). شناسایی مؤلفه‌های مؤثر در کاهش تاب‌آوری سازمان‌ها در شرایط بحرانی. فصلنامه دانش پیشگیری و مدیریت بحران، 7(4)، 322-332.
-توتکار، م.، فاضلی، م.، و حسنی، ن. (1401). بررسی مولفه‌های مؤثر بر تاب‌آوری سازمانی در زمان بحران. فصلنامه مدیریت بحران، 10(2)، 45-56.
-حسینی، ا.، و جعفری، ف. (1400). تاب‌آوری سازمانی در سازمان‌های دولتی. فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت، 30(95)، 25-12.
- سازمان راهداری و حمل‌ونقل جاده‌ای. (1394). گزارش تأسیس اداره کل راهداری و حمل‌ونقل جاده‌ای جنوب کرمان. تهران: سازمان راهداری و حمل‌ونقل جاده‌ای.
-Ataei, Y., Mahmoudi, A., Feylizadeh, M. R., & Li, D. F.  (2020). Ordinal priority approach (OPA) in multiple attribute decision-making. Applied Soft Computing, 86, 105893.
doi:org/10/1016/j.asoc.2019/105893
 
-Chen, R., Xie, Y., & Liu, Y. (2021). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring organizational resilience: A multiple case study. Sustainability, 13(5). 2517.
doi.org/10/3390/su13052517
-Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
doi.org/315312/10/2307
 -Gonçalves, L., Ribeiro, P., & da Silva, J. M. (2022). Resilience in road transport systems: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,104, 103202.
doi.org/10/1016/j.trd.2022/103202
 -Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4 -23.
doi.org /10/1146/annurev.es.04/110173/000245
-Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 50-55.
-Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79.
doi.org//1250495/1012307
 -McManus, S. T. (2008). Organisational resilience in New Zealand, Doctoral dissertation, University of Canterbury.
-Mitroff, I. I. (2005). Why some companies emerge stronger and better from a crisis: essential lessons for surviving disaster. AMACOM.
-Pal, R., Torstensson, H., & Mattila, H. (2014). Antecedents of organizational resilience in economic crises—An empirical study of Swedish textile and clothing SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 147,  410-428.
doi.org/101/1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.031